Success or failure in its realisation depends more upon the adoption of educational methods calculated to effect the change than upon anything else. For the change is essentially a change in the quality of mental disposition — an educative change. This does not mean that we can change character and mind by direct instruction and exhortation, apart from a change in industrial and political conditions. Such a conception contradicts our basic idea that character and mind are attitudes of participative response in social affairs. But it does mean that we may produce in schools a projection in type of the society we should like to realise, and by forming minds in accord with it gradually modify the larger and more recalcitrant features of adult society. Sentimentally, it may seem harsh to say that the greatest evil of the present regime is not found in poverty and in the suffering which it entails, but in the fact that so many persons have callings which make no appeal to them, which are pursued simply for the money reward that accrues. For such callings constantly provoke one to aversion, ill will, and a desire to slight and evade. Neither men’s hearts nor their minds are in their work. On the other hand, those who are not only much better off in worldly goods, but who are in excessive, if not monopolistic, control of the activities of the many are shut off from equality and generality of social intercourse. They are stimulated to pursuits of indulgence and display; they try to make up for the distance which separates them from others by the impression of force and superior possession and enjoyment which they can make upon others.
It would be quite possible for a narrowly conceived scheme of vocational education to perpetuate this division in a hardened form. Taking its stand upon a dogma of social predestination, it would assume that some are to continue to be wage earners under economic conditions like the present, and would aim simply to give them what is termed a trade education — that is, greater technical efficiency. Technical proficiency is often sadly lacking, and is surely desirable on all accounts — not merely for the sake of the production of better goods at less cost, but for the greater happiness found in work. For no one cares for what one cannot half do. But there is a great difference between a proficiency limited to immediate work, and a competency extended to insight into its social bearings; between efficiency in carrying out the plans of others and in one forming one’s own. At present, intellectual and emotional limitation characterises both the employing and the employed class. While the latter often have no concern with their occupation beyond the money return it brings, the former’s outlook may be confined to profit and power. The latter interest generally involves much greater intellectual initiation and larger survey of conditions. For it involves the direction and combination of a large number of diverse factors, while the interest in wages is restricted to certain direct muscular movements. But none the less there is a limitation of intelligence to technical and non-humane, non-liberal channels, so far as the work does not take in its social bearings. And when the animating motive is desire for private profit or personal power, this limitation is inevitable. In fact, the advantage in immediate social sympathy and humane disposition often lies with the economically unfortunate, who have not experienced the hardening effects of a one-sided control of the affairs of others.
Any scheme for vocational education which takes its point of departure from the industrial regime that now exists, is likely to assume and to perpetuate its divisions and weaknesses, and thus to become an instrument in accomplishing the feudal dogma of social predestination. Those who are in a position to make their wishes good, will demand a liberal, a cultural occupation, and one which fits for directive power the youth in whom they are directly interested. To split the system, and give to others, less fortunately situated, an education conceived mainly as specific trade preparation, is to treat the schools as an agency for transferring the older division of labour and leisure, culture and service, mind and body, directed and directive class, into a society nominally democratic. Such a vocational education inevitably discounts the scientific and historic human connections of the materials and processes dealt with. To include such things in narrow trade education would be to waste time; concern for them would not be “practical.” They are reserved for those who have leisure at command — the leisure due to superior economic resources. Such things might even be dangerous to the interests of the controlling class, arousing discontent or ambitions “beyond the station” of those working under the direction of others. But an education which acknowledges the full intellectual and social meaning of a vocation would include instruction in the historic background of present conditions; training in science to give intelligence and initiative in dealing with material and agencies of production; and study of economics, civics, and politics, to bring the future worker into touch with the problems of the day and the various methods proposed for its improvement. Above all, it would train power of re-adaptation to changing conditions so that future workers would not become blindly subject to a fate imposed upon them. This ideal has to contend not only with the inertia of existing educational traditions, but also with the opposition of those who are entrenched in command of the industrial machinery, and who realise that such an educational system if made general would threaten their ability to use others for their own ends.
John Dewey was an American philosopher, psychologist, and educational reformer whose ideas have been very influential. Although Dewey is known best for his publications concerning education, he also wrote about many other topics, including experience and nature, art and experience, logic and inquiry, democracy, and ethics
FEDERAL PUBLIC SERIVCE COMMISSION
Aga Khan Road , F-5/1
Islamabad , the 26th October, 2009 SUBJECT: COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION, 2009 (CSS) FOR RECRUITMENT TO THE
POSTS UNDER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN BS-17
It is notified that following candidates have qualified in the written part of the Competitive Examination, 2009
ROLL NO. NAME
28 Amer Ali
42 Athar Farooq
55 Bilal Sabir
65 Farasat Ali Shah
72 Farwa Saadia Batool
103 Jamal Shah Mashood
106 Junaid Ali Khan
113 Khizer Abbas
123 Maham Asif Malik
161 Muhammad Naveed Akbar
203 Rabia Abbasi
229 Syed Mansoor Shah Bukhari
230 Syed Muhammad Afsar Shah
265 Tamur Aman
271 Wajeeha Bashir
282 Zaheer Ahmad
286 Zofishan Manzoor
292 Abdullah Nayyar Sheikh
300 Arshad Ali
301 Arshad Ali
311 Azmat Ullah
333 Hina Sayeed
335 Humaira Mehmood
366 Muhammad Akbar Jan Gandapur
386 Muhammad Tamur Ali Khan Ganda
422 Saif Ullah
447 Abdul Slam
448 Abdul Wahhab Arshed
451 Adeel Khawar
466 Ali Noman
476 Asma Mubarik
Comments
Post a Comment