Skip to main content

Tunnel vision —Abdul Quayyum Kundi

Alliances are not based on constantly agreeing with one's peers, nor do they require that any one party reserve the authority to dictate terms that the other must accept unequivocally
In the past year, Pakistan hasn’t attracted as many American tourists as it has state department big wigs. US Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke is in Pakistan almost every other week. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Senator John Kerry was in the country recently to shed light on the ‘true intentions’ of the Kerry-Lugar Bill. And this past week, the most influential of them all, former first lady and current Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was in Pakistan for a much talked about visit.

Despite this deluge of high profile visits, it appears that the gulf between Pakistan and the United States is widening rather than abating. The reasons behind this are both historical and current. Historically, Pakistan blames the US for abandoning it during the war of 1965 as well as for the latter’s slow response in curtailing Indian interference that resulted in the loss of East Pakistan in 1971. Presently, it blames the US for imposing a proxy war on Pakistan as well as being directly responsible for the loss of innocent lives in drone attacks.

The US and Pakistan might be experiencing some bumps in their long-standing relationship, but Pakistanis must remember that a lot of their economic progress relies on the US. The US is home to one of the largest expatriate Pakistani populations in the world, close to 1.2 million by some estimates. American universities enrol have the most Pakistani students after the United Kingdom; the US healthcare industry employs over 15,000 Pakistani doctors; the US is the largest market for Pakistani exports; and Pakistani Americans send over 1.6 billion dollars in foreign remittances every year to Pakistan.

These facts should make Pakistan realise that the US is an important ally and that the relationship between both countries should not and cannot be defined by one bill or one administration. Based on its significance, it is important that both the government and the opposition should have a unified foreign policy position towards the US. Both the Republican and the Democratic parties in America have agreed on a joint policy towards Pakistan as demonstrated by the joint formulation of the Kerry-Lugar bill, put forward by Democratic Senator John Kerry and Republican Senator Richard Lugar. The opposition should refrain from resorting to un-diplomatic language that can damage long-term relations between the two countries.

Alliances are not based on constantly agreeing with one’s peers, nor do they require that any one party reserve the authority to dictate terms that the other must accept unequivocally. Diplomacy requires speaking with an open heart and mind with a view to sharing ideas and forming joint strategies to garner mutual benefits. Pakistan must try to convince the US that Afghanistan is a regional problem and all stakeholders in the region need to be invited to the discussion table. Pakistan must demonstrate that it is a moderate nation that is currently battling an extremist tide, which is not entirely of its own making despite some unwise policy decisions in the past.

In the early 1970s, Pakistan helped open the doors of cooperation between the US and China, neither of which had previously enjoyed diplomatic relations with each other. Pakistan can once again play that role by bringing Iran and the US to the table to sort out their differences and reduce tensions in the region. Iran shares borders with both Afghanistan and Iraq, making it almost imperative that both the US and Iran try and resolve their differences through dialogue. The European Union is not the right platform for this. A regional conference involving Iran, China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Afghanistan and the US could achieve many objectives, including agreements on Iran’s nuclear programme and the stabilisation of Afghanistan and Iraq.

No country can hope to expect steady economic growth if it faces terror threats on a daily basis and when almost all of its neighbours are hostile towards it. Economic growth requires peace, stability and continuity. Pakistan has weak political institutions, ineffective law and order and a narrow industrial base. If Pakistan wants to achieve long-term prosperity it must allow democracy to flourish, modernise its police and educate its masses.

The Pakistani people have demonstrated their resilience and sense of unity under conditions of extreme duress time and again. The Pakistani national response to the earthquake in 2005 and the unified position against constant terror attacks is a sure testimony to the nation’s resilience. All it needs now is capable leadership in all spheres of government to hopefully build upon the successful efforts of previous regimes rather than tear them down.

The writer is the president-elect of the Pakistan Chamber of Commerce-USA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CSS 2009 Written Result

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERIVCE COMMISSION Aga Khan Road , F-5/1 Islamabad , the 26th October, 2009 SUBJECT: COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION, 2009 (CSS) FOR RECRUITMENT TO THE POSTS UNDER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN BS-17 It is notified that following candidates have qualified in the written part of the Competitive Examination, 2009 ROLL NO. NAME 28 Amer Ali 42 Athar Farooq 55 Bilal Sabir 65 Farasat Ali Shah 72 Farwa Saadia Batool 103 Jamal Shah Mashood 106 Junaid Ali Khan 113 Khizer Abbas 123 Maham Asif Malik 161 Muhammad Naveed Akbar 203 Rabia Abbasi 229 Syed Mansoor Shah Bukhari 230 Syed Muhammad Afsar Shah 265 Tamur Aman 271 Wajeeha Bashir 282 Zaheer Ahmad 286 Zofishan Manzoor 292 Abdullah Nayyar Sheikh 300 Arshad Ali 301 Arshad Ali 311 Azmat Ullah 333 Hina Sayeed 335 Humaira Mehmood 366 Muhammad Akbar Jan Gandapur 386 Muhammad Tamur Ali Khan Ganda 422 Saif Ullah 447 Abdul Slam 448 Abdul Wahhab Arshed 451 Adeel Khawar 466 Ali Noman 476 Asma Mubarik

Foreign Service of Pakistan (FSP)

Well, I have opted for Foreign Service of Pakistan (FSP) as my first preference, and believe Foreign Service of Pakistan (FSP) is not merely a profession but life. It has several facades which make it distinguished from rest of the cadres. I take this opportunity to highlight few of them. In today’s highly transformational world, FSP provides opportunities to its diplomats to compete with best of the best of the world. Challenge and change are inherent in a Foreign Service Officer's professional life of service to his/her country. A diplomat can make a difference in the world. Soon after you join Pakistan Embassy/Mission as 3rd Secretary, your challenges-oriented life embarks upon. FSP is a life time learning cadre undoubtedly. Learning and exploring discerning cultures, languages, civilizations etc. are few of the pile novel experiences which a diplomat undergoes during his career. In order to rise to the occasion, FSP officers build their capacities inline with the vibrant and dy

CSS 2010 Allocations

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN CABINET SECRETARIAT ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION ***** PRESS NOTE Consequent upon qualifying the Competitive Examination, 2010 conducted by the Federal Public Service Commission, 199 candidates have been selected for appointment against BS-17 posts of the Occupational Groups/Services. 2. All the candidates are advised to send acceptance of their respective Groups/ Services on Fax No.051-9201526 or through Urgent Mail Service to Section Officer (T-V), Establishment Division, Cabinet Block, Islamabad, within fifteen days of the issuance of this Press Note, failing which, the offer shall stand cancelled and no representation will be entertained. Details of the groups/services allocated to the candidates are as under:- MERIT VACANCIES=17 PAKISTAN AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS SERVICE= 01 VACANCY S.NO MERIT NO ROLL NO NAME OF THE CANDIDATE 1 76 10232 Zain Ul Abidin PAKISTAN CUSTOMS SERVICE= 01 VACANCY S.NO MERIT NO ROLL NO NAME OF THE CANDIDATE 1 19 9691 Naseeb Ullah Khan DISTRICT MAN